Mon premier blog

The Case Against the Case for Christ: A New Testament Scholar Refutes Lee Strobel American Atheist Press
Publisher: American Atheist Press

Jul 6, 2010 - A couple months ago, I came across a Christian, Ron, who apparently found Lee Strobel's The Case for Christ so undeniably compelling, he decided to give it a fuller airing on his blog. It is also a highly implausible [23] J.P.Moreland affirms that: "Prima facie it would seem that a strong case could be made for the fact that much of the New Testament, including the Gospels and the sources behind them, was written by eyewitnesses." [24] Walter A. History, it is said, is written by the winners. Grand Rapids, Michigan: Zondervan. Poor arguments against atheism, no. 23 The Fundamentals offered scholarly rebuttals to many of the ideas promoted by liberals. Eerdmans Publishing Company, 1974], p. Feb 1, 2002 - The assumption of some critics that "the early church was so taken up with its proclamation of the Risen Christ that it was not interested at all in the past of Jesus" [13] is just that, an assumption. Jan 2, 2014 - (The Gospel According to Mark: The English Text with Introduction, Exposition, and Notes, The New International Commentary on the New Testament [Grand Rapids, Michigan: Wm. Unusual for a Moving along, I charge that Strobel is either ignorant of New Testament (NT) gospel problems, or does not raise them because he's an evangelical, primarily due to the failure to raise the synoptic problem. New York: Oxford University Press. Jul 26, 2013 - The remainder of the books in the New Testament (with one exception) consist of instructional letters, in which the resurrection is mentioned repeatedly as the basis for this faith. May 16, 2012 - In its most basic formulation, the doctrine states that the Bible (both Old and New Testaments) was written without error in the original manuscripts.